Nationalist Coalition Blog

Jailhouse Letter from Ed Steele Explains How He Was Framed

Since his arrest weeks ago Idaho attorney Edgar Steele has been unable to get a letter out of the Spokane County Jail until now. He is being held on very shaky federal charges of solicitation for murder.

In his letter Steele asserts that a confidential informant (CI) working with the feds’ lied to them regarding an alleged plot about a “murder for hire”. The CI and the government devised the “murder for hire” story to try and cover up his theft of tens of thousands of dollars in silver coins the CI had stolen from Steele sometime earlier.

Click here for original article

More Evidence Of Toxic Rain?

In the following video environmentalist John Wathen discusses some reports of toxic rain in the Gulf region. He also talks about his recent flight in the area and how he noticed his plane was coated with a thin oil sheen after he arrived back at the airport.

Too White to be American

These people have plenty of nerve, I’ll give them that. Listen to them telling White People to go back to Europe.

Using A Bowdrill To Make Fire

In the following video John Reilly of BushCraftBums shows how quick and easy it is to make a fire using the bowdrill method.

Wow! Seriously? The Second Coming by 2050?

Hi! My first post in this forum. Been taking mental notes for a long time trying to keep track of all the things I see happening in this country that leave me a bit bewildered or dumbfounded. This is what I will call a ‘Wow! Seriously?’ series.

In the August edition of Smithsonian magazine, a new poll was released from the well known and respected Pew Research Center and Smithsonian Magazine. The poll was conducted via telephone and online interviews with over 1,500 Americans last April and was released in the “Smithsonian magazine’s 40th Anniversary” edition.

The results are worth review and you can find all the details at the below site and PDF file. The poll showed a noticeable dip in Americans optimism compared to a 1999 poll covering the same subjects, not really suprizing. But what caught my eye was the below.

Roughly 41% of Americans think that Jesus Christ will return to earth by the year 2050, this would be the Second Coming of Christ, you know, the Messiah, the Savior, the Lamb of God, the Son of God. This would be the biblical Rapture I believe. All tour dates were canceled at the Millennium which was the last time I heard about this Prophecy. This is my first Wow! Seriously? contribution to this blog.

Sure, you could play the statistics and say that more Americans think this absolutely will not happen but you would miss the Wow! Seriously? point. You should think on this one a bit and let it bake for awhile.

Pew/Smithsonian Poll: Americans Predict Life in 2050

“About four-in-ten (41%) expect Jesus Christ to return while slightly more (46%) say this will definitely or probably not happen. Opinions about the return of Jesus Christ are little changed from 1999 when 44% said it would definitely or probably happen.”

So for you statisticians and common-sensors out there, you know who you are, run the numbers and use a little simple mathematics. According to the current U.S. Bureau of the Census’ POPClock Projection , there are roughly 309 million people in this country, or 309,744,156 and counting. Of these, and keeping in mind the Pew reported +/- 3% margin of error, almost 127 million Americans expect “Jesus Christ’s Return to Earth” within the next forty years. So that means if you took the entire populations of California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (the top 6 most populous states), throw in Phoenix, Arizona (the 5th most populous city), you would still need over 54,000 more people to represent the number falling into the category expecting “Jesus Christ’s Return to Earth” . So to underscore the point, Wow! Seriously?

Now please excuse me while I pick our girls up at soccer practice and explain a few things about peer-pressure, the psychological concept of conformity, and spend a moment of appreciation for our homeschooling curriculum.

Click here for original Poll: Americans Predict Life in 2050 article

Click here for original Poll: Americans Predict Life in 2050 (FULL PDF report) article

America’s Militias Respond to 3-Day Muster Along Deteriorating Arizona Border

In the following video Dutch Joens of the Dutch Joens Radio Program discusses a call to action that recently went out to America’s militias to assist in securing Arizona’s violent border with Mexico.

The Jews fire Lebanese American Journalist Octavia Nasr from CNN

Members of the Nationalist Coalition have discussed the problem of Jewish media ownership and control on this blog, and in Nationalist Matters. The Nationalist Coalition has also discussed the affect of this control over the information shaping public opinion. In particular, we’ve talked about the “bias” which exists on any issue of interest to The Tribe. Recently, a Lebanese American journalist, Helen Thomas, was forced to resign from her position in the mass media, after making unpopular comments about Israel’s occupation of the Gaza and West Bank. Bear in mind, freedom of speech is intended to protect unpopular, rather than popular, opinions. This freedom is supposed to be guaranteed under the 1rst Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, the Constitution, as construed by the Supreme Court, holds that only government cannot abridge free speech; private citizens and corporations are at liberty to deny free speech.  I am sure the founding fathers would have elaborated more on First Amendment protections if they’d known that the mainstream media would be seized by Jewish people, who have been historically hostile and presently degenerative to the Western European way of life.  It would appear that Americans would have greater protections on their liberties if it was the government, not private corporations and media monopolies, abridging free speech: at least there would be legal recourse.  In the case of Helen Thomas, the Tribe saw the perceived need to silence a media maverick who dared to criticize Israel at a time when Israel is coping with a public relations nightmare, due in part to the blockade on the Gaza and West bank and the recent Massacre on the Mediterranean. It wasn’t enough to hang Helen Thomas on the gallows, however.

Control must be exercised constantly in order for it to be effective. If journalists perceived that they would only lose their jobs for reporting unpopular opinions some of the time, rather than all of the time, unpopular opinions would become more popular. That is why The Tribe made a swift example out of Lebanese American journalist Octavia Nasr.

After working for CNN for 20 years, Octavia Nasr was fired for making a comment on Twitter regarding the death of Lebanese cleric, Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah. Specifically, she said his death saddened her, as he was a man she respected. He was instrumental in reshaping Lebanese opinions on womens’ rights, and Nasr had previously interviewed him on CNN. But Fadlallah was allegedly affiliated with Hezbollah, a group with which Israel has been at war for years.  The Jewish Simon Weisnthall Center was the first to demand that Nasr be sacked.  And CNN, which is controlled by Jews like Gerlad Levin and Jonathon Miller, promptly complied with the Weisnthall Center’s demands.

The Jews, through their controlled media, brand Hezbollah a terrorist group. But in the Jewish owned and controlled media, “terrorist” isn’t a word used to describe Israel, despite Israel’s responsibility for massacres in Lebanon, including Sabra and Shatilla.   The grim reality is that control of the Jewish mainstream media means that Lebanese who fight for their land against brutal and ruthless occupiers are terrorists; but the blood-spilling occupiers are innocent ambassadors of the holy eye in the sky.

The temporal reality is also that unpopular opinions by journalists like Helen Thomas and Octavia Nasr are censored in the Jewish controlled mainstream media in order for the Tribe to maintain control and mitigate Israel’s terrible public relations in the international community.  Silencing and censoring less than pro-Zionist journalists in the mainstream media is a necessary step in maintaining the control over the information shaping public opinion.  The Jewish people, confesses writers for the Jewish Telegraph Agency, are engaged in a “media war.”   And in the media war, the Jewish people vie to take-out enemy personnel, which includes anyone with a less than flattering opinion of The Tribe, journalists especially, people like Helen Thomas and Octavia Nasr.

Those who realize that the issue of Jewish monopoly upon the mainstream media is indisputable elect to argue, alternatively, that Jews do not abuse their media powers or use such powers to our detriment.  However, the recent cases of Helen Thomas and Octavia Nasr demonstrate that these powers are in fact abused and bias does in fact exist, where the Jews actively suppress and censor any views unflattering towards Israel.  Those who cling to the illusion that free speech still exists should ask themselves whether a nation which truly guarantees free speech would allow “journalists” to be fired for dissenting from the views of the Jewish people, who make up only 2% of the American population.   I’ll say that again, how can free speech really exist when so-called objective “journalists” are unable to dissident from 2% of the population without losing their jobs?

Jewish people are pathetic.

Read more at The Guardian

Do It Yourself Lighter Striker

In the following video the people at BushCraftOnFire show how to make an inexpensive Lighter Striker. This item would be a great addition for your bugout bag or camping pack.

Aharon Barak, hero to some, clever to all

We are about to release our latest Nationalist Matters transcript covering the history of the Supreme Court ,or at least a chosen slice of the Supreme Courts history. What prompted this subject was the ongoing Senate Judiciary hearing of President Obama’s last Supreme Court Justice. But it really goes much deeper and much further back than that.

Until then, we could at least discuss one facet of Supreme Court Justice-nominee, Elena Kagan. She has been around awhile at one time serving in President Clinton’s administration and currently serving as Solicitor General in President Obama’s administration. She served as the Dean of Harvard Law School and once clerked for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first Black to serve that court.

And, oh yea, she will be the eighth Jewish Supreme court Justice to sit on the highest court in the land, the third to be sitting on the current Supreme Court, and the second to be sitting on the current Supreme Court that is another Jew from New York. Kagan shares her gender with that other beauty Justice Ruth Ginsberg. Between them, two New York Jews with proportionally higher estrogen to testosterone production will hold both female and Jewish Justice seats on the Court, seats simultaneously. While Justice Breyer holds the third Jewish seat, he is a West Coast Jew and carries an inverse estrogen to testosterone factor. But these days that really only counts in synagogue.

Speaking of synagogue, when Kagan turned 12 years-old, she decided it was important for her to have a bat mitzvah, the female equivalent of a bar mitzvah and Jewish coming of age celebration, at synagogue. Her family was attending an Orthodox synagogue but the rabbi had never performed a bat mitzvah, the old-school tradition was only for bar mitzvah at synagogue. Rabbi Shlomo Riskin conceded to her demands but have her only a compromised version saving the Jewish Orthodox traditions for the boys (Judaism is not as gender-enlightened as perhaps Jewess Ginsberg and Jewess Kagan would like).

More on all that soon. What should be pointed out in addition to our pending Nationalist Matters transcript is what the controlled mass media will not spend any or much time on regarding these Senate Judiciary hearings. The kosher-party-line shell-game involves misdirection, deception, and irrelevance. They will chuckle about remarks Kagan had about Christmas and Chinese restaurants but nothing important. The biggest distraction seems to be Kagan’s military recruiting efforts, or lack thereof, in light of the politically incorrect “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that is also not important.

What is a bit more important, besides the obvious Jewish Supremacy Court effect, is something that came to my attention during the Senate hearings. So I guess the Senate just going through the motions show for tradition and the media was helpful for me. Soon to be Justice Kagan was called on the carpet for remarks she made years ago while Dean at the Harvard Law School. This must have happened while most of the kosher-party-line crew was on a bathroom break as it did not make it prominently in the headlines. However there is a lot of information and even video available for review.

Apparently Elena Kagan has proudly claimed that the President of the Supreme Court of Israel, Aharon Barak, was her personal “judicial hero”. She actually said much more than that but that was enough. That may not leave much of an impression until you dig deeper into who Aharon Barak actually is. That is the main point of this post and is what should have made headline news as well as rattled the cage of the collective citizenry of this Democracy.

Aharon Barak was a judge on the Israeli Supreme Court for almost 30 years, leaving the court only after reaching the maximum allowed age of 70 years-old. When appointed to the Supreme Court, Aharon Barak became the youngest ever Justice to be appointed to that court. For over 10 of those years he served as the President of the Israeli Supreme Court which would be like the Chief Justice in the US Supreme Court. But don’t make too many more comparisons between these two distinctly different courts. Before serving on the Supreme Court, he served as the Attorney General of Israel and was considered by some as Israel’s most powerful Attorney General. Under his watch as Attorney General, he is attributed with brining about the resignation of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1977. This led directly to the election of Israel’s first-ever right-wing government headed by Menachem Begin. And Oy vey did Begin have some things to do and say. This is not to say Aharon Barak is an Israel right-winger because he certainly is not. Aharon Barak is an intelligent and accomplished Jew from a family of accomplished Jews. His great uncle, Rabbi Meir Katz (pictured above), was also the founder of the Jewish Peoples Bank of Lithuania.

The buzzword at the Senate hearing that brought Elena Kagan admiration for Aharon Barak to the floor was “activist judge”. It was the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Jeff Sessions, that had the initial politically-incorrect confrontation (FYI, VERY politically-incorrect to use the name of Israel, or anything related to it, in vain and especially in the Senate!). Truth is, Senator Sessions was not even taking the gloves off with his questions and Kagan was allowed to quickly dismiss any unflattering impact.

But with some scrutiny and research we find that Barak is really more of an ultra-activist judge preaching for a universally accepted ultra-activist judiciary. Under a Barak judicial philosophy, which the Israeli Supreme Court adopted and used, a judge has the responsibility and obligation to not only interpret the law but to also fill in any gaps that may exist within it. Not really the sort of judiciary our Founding Fathers had in mind but they also did not have in mind a highly Jewish judiciary. Regardless, Barak’s judicial philosophy is modeled somewhat after the system our Founding Fathers did put in place.

Other things to note about Kagan’s hero Barak, he successfully reduced the dominant appearance of Jewish Law, or Halacha, as he “interpreted” and filled-in gaps within the law. Excising the influence of Judaism on the laws helps us dismiss as almost irrelevant the issue of Judaism to our understanding of Jews. In addition to pulling the Kosher wheels off of Israeli legislation, Barak is also attributed with being the driving force behind the creation of an Israeli Constitution, something that officially has never existed. While on the Supreme Court, Barak argued that Israel’s 1992 passage of Basic Law introduced the framework for which he and his fellow Justices would imply an official Constitution. Then they got busy interpreting and filling in gaps and crafting a quasi-Constitution. He is truly an activist judge, a radical judge, and a proud and flaming liberal judge.

From his book, see what Barak says about the law as he explains his legal philosophy. This is profoundly radical and what I would call an ultra-activist view of the law.

Aharon Barak, “Judicial Philosophy and Judicial Activism,” pp 477 and 485

“In my eyes, the world is filled with law. Every human behavior is subject to a legal norm. Even when a certain type of activity-such as friendship or subjective thoughts-is ruled by the autonomy of the individual will, this autonomy exists, because it is recognized by the law…. Wherever there are living human beings, law is there. There are no areas in life which are outside of law.”

The legal philosophy of Aharon Barak is something to read and think about if you are an Israeli citizen, or at least if you were an Israeli citizen during his rule on the Israeli Supreme Court. He thinks that the ‘law’ is omnipresent, ubiquitous and all-encompassing. Anything the ‘law’ does not prohibit it must therefore permit, and the opposite would hold true too. A universe of laws that will be deciphered, clarified, and expanded upon, by a judicial branch of the government. The legal philosophy of Aharon Barak, his endorsed jurisprudence, is simple to understand but requires a little thought to truly understand. In his above quote, even human free-will produced subjective thoughts are under the jurisdiction of the ‘law’ and a governmental judiciary will help document, interpret, and adjudicate.

That is something for Israelis to deal with but the fact that Aharon Barak sat on its Supreme Court for almost three decades tells us how they dealt with it. It becomes something for us to think and deal with when the Aharon Barak legal philosophy is embraced here, for example, when a Supreme Court Justice or a nominee to that court indicates a sympathetic attitude towards that philosophy.

Now bring in a real-world example of Barak’s legal philosophy in action. The Jerusalem Post has an article from 2006 illustrating the outcome of some Barak ultra-activist jurisprudence in action. In a nutshell, Israel, like the vast majority of the entire world, did not recognize gay marriage. Read one reporters take on how Barak used his liberal activism from the bench to put Israel into the minority of countries that permit gay marriage. The Jerusalem Post reporter, who obviously does not share soon to be Justice Kagan’s judicial hero-worship of Justice Barak, described the legal philosophy pretty well. In the gay marriage case the legal claim is that Israel must presume gay marriage is legal because the Israeli legislature, the Knesset, had not explicitly made it illegal.

Actually, from my perspective, if he were not a Jewish (and Zionist by the way), ultra-liberal, ultra-activist, former Israeli Supreme Court Justice, I might also admire his ability to craft such a slick legal philosophy and use his position to implement it. But alas, Aharon Barak is all the above and my objective now is just to make sure you understand where soon to be Supreme Court Justice Kagan gets her motivation.

Click here for original Jerusalem Post article

Matt Simmons Details Potential Fallout From Gulf Oil Disaster

In his interview with TruNews Matt Simmons details the scenarios which are likely to play out in the Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster. Simmons explains how the Methane gas in the region has the potential to kill hundreds of thousands of people if it is brought on shore by a hurricane.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Some Kind of Record?

We all know the Commie in Chief is a liar, but seven lies in under two minutes? Really, what’s he doing, going for a record?

How Low Can A Negro Go Part III of Infinity

Israel Confiscates Palestinian Oxygen Machines

If news about Israel wasn’t actually real, current events about Israel and the middle east would be hilarious.  If the world understood that everything Israel reportedly does is merely satire, and if the world understood the Jewish media’s glaringly obvious bias to be a parody, then middle eastern news would be on a comic par with The Onion. What makes the Onion so funny is the fact that you know the news is merely satire.  In Israel’s case, the news has all of the elements of humorous satire, but there is no disclaimer.  Unlike the Onion, Israel’s audaciousness is quite real.  It’s almost—but not quite—funny.

When Israel confiscated seven oxygen machines en route to hospitals in the Gaza and West Bank, claiming the oxygen machines would not be used for “medical purposes,” this was yet another example of a story that would yield many laughs if rolled out in The Onion.   Oxygen machines being used for non-medical purposes?   Wow!

Click here for original article

Gulf of Mexico – Breaking The Media Blackout

In the following video Warren Pollock explains how the disaster is spreading beyond the federal fishing exclusion zone.

As you can see this doesn’t bode well for people living on Florida’s west coast, because as the video shows it’s only a matter of time before the spill starts impacting the state’s gulf coast.

Times Square Bomber: We will be attacking the US

Yesterday the “Times Square Bomber”, Faisal Shahzad, a 30 year-old Pakistani American, plead guilty to all 10 charges facing him and admitted and described in detail why and how he committed the crime. I have not discussed this story in the past and it really did not seem like anything unique or different from any of the other so called “homegrown terrorist” cases we have seen in recent time. We have said over and over that these cases inevitably reflect the foreign policies of our government and it is We the People that will pay!. The “Times Square Bomber” introduced nothing new on that front.

What is new this time is that we were clearly told why we are being attacked, once again, and that it is We the People that will pay!. You will not hear much about this in the kosher-party-line, or at least you will not hear it loudly and objectively enough, so you have to dig a little. Several news reports will paraphrase the court transcript from the hearing and some will quote directly. But in my opinion most do not do the hearing justice. For the full transcript of the hearing, see U.S. v. Shahzad, 10-00928, transcript. And when I say we were clearly warned once again, just look at the statements from anyone described or labeled as a “homegrown terrorist”.

On Monday, June 21st, in the US Federal District Court of Judge Miriam Goldman-Cedarbaum, Faisal Shahzad clearly stated his guilt, his intentions, and his motivation. In an often combative exchange with the Judge Goldman-Cedarbaum, Shahzad stated “we will be attacking US” . The full transcript is worth the read.

U.S. v. Shahzad, case #10-00928

Shahzad: “I want to plead guilty and I’m going to plead guilty a hundred times forward because until the hour the US pulls it forces from Iraq and Afghanistan and stops the drone strikes in Somalia and Yemen and in Pakistan and stops the occupation of Muslim lands and stops killing the Muslims and stops reporting the Muslims to its government, we will be attacking US, and I plead guilty to that.

When asked about targeting American civilians, Shahzad: “Well, the people select the government. We consider them all the same. The drones, when they hit….Afghanistan and Iraq, they don’t see children, they don’t see anybody. They kill women, children, they kill everybody. It’s a war, and in war, they kill people. They’re killing all Muslims…..I am part of the answer to the US terrorizing the Muslim nations and the Muslim people, and on behalf of that, I’m avenging the attacks.

While elaborating on what he and others avenge, Shahzad: “Similarly, in Gaza Strip, somebody has to go and live with the family whose house is bulldozed by the Israeli bulldozer.”

And to be sure, Shahzad has been telling anyone and everyone he could why he was attempting to attack America, American citizens in specific, since he was apprehended on a flight to Dubai back in May. The Washington Post has reported that Shahzad immediately started telling law enforcement officials about his intentions and motivation. Reportedly he asked one law enforcement official rhetorically, “How would you feel if people attacked the United States? You are attacking a sovereign Pakistan.” Shahzad was referring to US drone attacks that have been less than precise and have resulted in many civilian deaths. At this week’s hearing he even mentioned the Israeli atrocities in the Gaza Strip. Immediately he was telling investigators why he and others were going to strike Americans. For more on the evidence presented, which Shahzad essentially accepted and plead guilty to, see the below Department of Justice, DOJ, press release.

Another unique and somewhat surprising outcome from the Faisal Shahzad case is that he decided to plead guilty to all charges. And when I say he decided to ‘plead guilty’ I do not mean to imply he negotiated a plea bargain with the prosecutors. There is absolutely no plea agreement between Shahzad and the government. When the Judge asked Shahzad what he wanted to plead, he proudly and enthusiastically said guilty. He said he would like to plead guilty and “to plead guilty and 100 times more”. We don’t see that every day.

This is a “guilty and 100 times more” to ten Federal charges, six of which carry a maximum penalty of Life in prison. One was attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and the other was conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction and the list went on. So Shahzad is not going to be paroled anytime soon and the sentencing hearing is scheduled for October.

Even though it is not being broadcasted and reported like it should be, it is nice to get this all laid out in clear terminology. I doubt you will find CNN or the rest of the kosher-party-line crew spending much time on the court transcript or the warning we should all assume from his statements. Faisal Shahzad and many more like him are not isolated, lunatic “terrorists”. They represent a growing population of devoted, revolutionary, volunteer fighters, bringing unconventional and somewhat unorthodox lethal tactics to America. These are those we have been told to label “terrorists” that have been warning us for over a decade now that they will bring fight to America. And they are not bringing it from the wings of mental hospitals. They are bringing the fight to America from the Middle East, where US foreign policy has promoted the fight against them and their people.

And we, the American people, obviously have not received the message nor learned our lesson. From my perspective, it is clearly our responsibility to not only hear the message and understand the warning but to also address our culpability and involvement. You may not feel personally responsible for our government’s foreign policy in the Middle East but it has created enemies for you personally and the list is growing. The rest of the world is going to find us all personally responsible for at least electing the government that continues to enforce these policies. That is why people like the “Times Square Bomber”, and any other “homegrown terrorist”, keep appearing and will continue to keep appearing until something changes. These things will undoubtedly upset the kosher apple cart but it is We the People that will need to decisively respond to make these changes.

Click here for original BBC article

Click here for U.S. v. Shahzad, 10-00928, transcript

Click here for original Washington Post article

Click here for original Department of Justice, DOJ, press release

Afraid of the Internet Kill Switch? Purchase a Shortwave Radio

In this video I talk about the importance of having a shortwave receiver. I also do a short review of the Kaito KA1102 portable shortwave radio.

The St. Petersburg Times’ Poor Excuse For A Blog

by John Ubele

Over the last several years we’ve seen an explosion of blogs. These websites have become increasingly popular and pose a serious threat to the influence of conventional media outlets.

Up until two years ago few outlets had blog pages attached to their sites, but since that time they’ve created different types of blogs to try to appeal to their audience. Despite their best efforts they’re failing not because of a lack of resources or technical issues but because they’re producing posts that people just don’t care to read.

One great example of a blog with very poor content is the St. Petersburg Times “The Feed” which is maintained by the Times’ media critic Eric Deggans. In his blog Deggans writes about subjects people just don’t care about; such as actors, musicians and media personalities. Some of his recent posts have titles like; Former Biggest Loser contestant Kai Hibbard tells CBS’ The Early Show “I participated in a myth that hurts people”, Former WTSP-Ch. 10 anchor Jennifer Howe arrested twice this week for incidents involving neighbors and Bay News 9 wins national Edward R. Murrow award for its website.

I mean seriously how important is it to us about reality shows which tell lies? Or about the personal life of an unemployed news anchor, or better yet, about a local media outlet winning an award? Stories like these don’t increase readership they damage it by pushing readers away.

Until news organizations post stories that benefit people, they will continue to lose their audience to the independently owned blogs and other alternative news sites which give readers something that will actually inform and educate them.

Jews Reveal Their Plans For Global Domination

The following video is a compilation of quotes from respected leaders of the global Jewish community. Please share this video with your contacts.

Yo Adrian!

Ok, admittedly with ‘Yo Adrian!’ I am mixing up my Hollywood metaphors but I could not think of anything noteworthy that Rambo ever said……..but Rocky has some quality one-liners.

So this week an American citizen was arrested in northwestern Pakistan for what appears to be the first such case of an American hunting Osama bin Laden. The 52-year-old, Gary Brooks Faulkner, reportedly a construction worker from California, was arrested near heavily forested area in the Kalash Valley, Pakistan.

He was arrested while armed with a pistol, a dagger, and what has been called “religious literature on Christianity”. For simplicity and you heathens out there, we will just call that the bible. He was also carrying night-vision equipment, including goggles and a camera. The sword was an Arabic variety known as a scimitar, having a large 40 inch, curved blade. And that apparently was for an infinitely important mission Faulkner had taken on. He told authorities he was on a “‘mission to decapitate Osama bin Laden” . According to the Associated Press, Faulkner told police, “God is with me, and I am confident I will be successful in killing him,” the Associated Press reports.

Apparently Mr. Faulkner has been to Pakistan many times before and for the same reason. Certainly the September 11th attacks and the $25 million dollar reward for capturing Osama bin Laden, dead or alive, are attractive motivators for decapitating the world’s most-wanted man. But I am not completely sure what Mr. Faulkner’s motivation was.

Some might say he is just a little off-balance, mentally speaking that is. When your own brother feels compelled to immediately tell reporters you are “not crazy….not a psychopath and….not a sociopath” , things might be just a little questionable on the sanity side. That is more or less the statement Mr. Faulkner’s brother, Dr. Scott Faulkner, made to reporters. That does not mean you are automatically crazier than a s#it-house rat or nuttier than a squirrel (word for squirrel feces). But I do think it brings ones sanity at least slightly into question. And when you travel from America to Pakistan to cut the head off the world’s most-wanted man, wearing night vision goggles, touting an Arabic sword, and clinching the bible, I am just saying red-flag dude! Red-flag!

But oh yea, I almost forgot, when arrested Mr. Faulkner was also found to be in possession of a “small amount of hashish” in addition to his Christian literature and night-vision goggles. They say God works in mysterious ways but any mystery around Gary “Chong” Faulkner clears up with that last little bit of evidence.

Click here for original DAWN Media Group article

Click here for original BBC article

Click here for original AFP- article

The St. Petersburg Times Throws In The Towel

In the following video I talk about the recent lawsuit filed by the St. Petersburg Times against the city of St. Petersburg.

The Brotherhood Of The Unchosen: Spanking Jewish Butts Since 4000 BC.

Those who are relatively new to the ideas and philosophies of White Nationalism, and even humanitarianism, often wonder what the deal is with the “Jews.”  Most Gentiles aren’t aware of the history of Jewish-Gentile conflict, nor the survival strategies of the The Tribe. They have no clue that Jewish people, being only 2% of the U.S. population, wield an extraordinary amount of power and influence.  Much of this power is wielded through their monopoly of the mass media (see also, Who Rules America and Who Rules America 2.0 Web Based).

Knowing that there is a monopoly upon the mainstream media, and understanding how Jews think, however, are separate matters entirely.   But when these subjects are explored together, one can see that that Jews not only have a monopoly upon the mainstream media but wield this monopoly in such a way as to exercise extreme media bias.   The pro-Israel bias in the Jewish owned and controlled mass-media is glaringly obvious to anyone who follows the conflict in the middle east.  That’s why I was shocked to read an op ed article by Jew, Gary Wexler,  titled What We Can Learn From Anti-Israel Activists.  Mr. Wexler is a board member of the Jewish Telegraph Agency, an openly pro-Jewish media news source, and also the owner of Passion Marketing.  Wexler asserts that Israel is losing a public relations battle in the “media.”

How could this happen, despite Jewish ownership and control of the mainstream media and the pertinent pro-Israel bias?  The internet perhaps?  Even with a Jewish acquisition of internet social networking and entertainment web sites, there is still an uncontrolled blogosphere on the internet where the truth can not be silenced.  Bloggers can not be forced to resign from their unpaid positions, as the Jews forced White House correspondent Helen Thomas to resign recently for merely uttering unflattering facts and opinions about Israel in the wake of the Massacre on the Mediterranean.

The forced resignation of Helen Thomas is a perfect example of the pro-Israel mainstream media bias which makes Wexler’s concerns about “alternative media” so interesting.   There are not thousands of Helen Thomas’ in the mainstream media.  But there are thousands upon thousands of Israeli critics in the alternative media.  Alternative media, by the way, is really just a euphemism for the tiny fraction of media that the Jews do not own and control.  Gentiles (non-Jews) are limited to alternative media if they are to express their ethnic interests as Gentiles.  Gentile, moreover, is just a politer word for “Goyim” (a racial slur used by Jews to denote non-Jews).  Non-Jews, Gentiles, Goyim, are all words used interchangeably to describe the majority of human beings of all races of mankind who were not “chosen” by god.

Lets just call ourselves the Brotherhood of the Unchosen.

In the eyes of expert Jewish marketer, Gary Wexler, the Brotherhood of the Unchosen is kicking the ass of the brotherhood of the Chosen.  Alternative media is much like David, and the mainstream media is much like Goliath, to use a Jewish metaphor.   Good job, team Unchosen!  Go team go!  What makes the Brotherhood of the Unchosen so perplexing to Jews like Gary Wexler is that we are not vying for recognition, credit or visibility.

We are not driven by money or ego, but rather by idealism.

That is why we cannot be stopped or silenced.

White Nationalists and humanitarians are all part and parcel of the Brotherhood of the Unchosen.  Many if not most White Nationalists share humanitarian ideas.  White Nationalists simply believe racial separation, racial self-governance and racial self-determination are the best ways to achieve peace, sort of a two-state solution applied to all races who desire it.  But a person does not have to be White, or a White Nationalist, in order to be a humanitarian or value peace.   The one thing which binds the Brotherhood of the Unchosen together is a mutual agreement that the policies and behavior of Israel, as exposed in the investigative findings of Goldstone Report, are appalling and shocking.

Ultimately, as a professional marketer, Gary Wexler recognizes that Israel is becoming a tough product to sell in its current state.  Israel is like a product which, if manufactured and sold on the market, would have to be recalled: it kills too many people and destroys too many lives.   Like a toy bulldozer that decapitates toddlers who aren’t Jewish, Israel is getting increasingly more difficult to market to Gentiles.  Wexler says “If media is among the determining wars, then Israel will have to revise some of its policies…”   Duh!  Well, he is smart enough to understand that Israel must “lead by example” when it comes to humanitarianism and philanthropy, instead of being the quintessential example of a dichotomy.  Wexler knows that Israel has to change its supremacist policies, stop illegal settlements, and give up at least “some” of the land it has stolen, or else the Brotherhood of the Unchosen will send the modern day Goliath to the doctor with more than just a contusion in the media war.  In the alternative media, the Brotherhood of the Unchosen will spank Israel’s bottom the way that Hizbollah spanked Israel’s bottom not so very long ago on Arab soil. In the information war, says Wexler.  “…they are winning. Which means we are losing.  Allow me to say that again. They are winning. We are losing.”

Wexler confesses that each action Israel takes today must consider the media war and how it plays. The days of saying “Who cares what the world thinks?” are over. What the world thinks, in Wexler’s opinion, is important for Israel’s security and future (unfortunately for all mankind, it’s apparently not important to Israel, however).  Wexler says that there is neither right nor left in the media war, but rather “what plays and what does not.”   Wexler is perplexed that despite Jewish resources and pro-Israel activism, Jewry still hasn’t figured out “what plays.”  He states:

“The Israeli government has its role. The Israel Foreign Ministry’s Israel Branding has its role. AIPAC has its role. AJC has its role. CAMERA has its role. The Israel Project has its role. Israel 21C has its role. The federations have their roles. The foundations have their roles. The campus organizations have their roles. The left has its strategies. The right has its strategies.”

All of the above Jewish organizations have a role in covering up Israel’s crimes and destabilizing our own countries.  But they still haven’t figured out “what plays.”  What plays is being a human being, instead of a psychopath.   What plays is being honest, rather than being a compulsive liar.  What plays is buying land instead of stealing it.  After the Brotherhood of the Unchosen expelled Jews from Gentile countries over 70 times in the past two milleniums for things that “don’t play,” a reasonable person would imagine that Jews would have” figured it out” by now.    Honest and morally ethical people would neither have the history nor the future of the Jewish people.

Hey Gary Wexler.  From one marketer to another, you got it right: there’s no market for Jewish Supremacism in today’s international community.  Good luck convincing Israel to change policies.

Trackback to Gary Wexler’s article in the JTA:

http://www.jta.org/trackback/2739505/

How To Build A Semi Permanent Shelter

In the following videos the people from Bushcraftonfire demonstrate how easy it is to build a semi permanent shelter.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

BP To Cleanup Workers: Wear Respirator And You’ll Be Fired!

In the following segment of Democracy Now the hosts discuss the respiratory problems being experienced by many of the cleanup workers.

The St. Petersburg Times: A Paper That Deserves To Be Put Down

by John Ubele

Of all the newspapers in America which deserve to be put out of business one in particular stands out; the St. Petersburg Times. The newspaper and its sadistic staff have a very twisted way of conducting business. Not only does their writing have a very Marxist slant, but the chutzpah which they demonstrate is especially noteworthy.

Recently the city of St. Petersburg passed an ordinance banning all street solicitation inside the city limits. The code wasn’t discriminatory in any way, it bans all people and businesses from soliciting money or selling items to motorists on the city’s streets.

St. Petersburg had a very big problem with panhandlers and because of hundreds of complaints the city decided to hold hearings about banning panhandling. After many meetings and much discussion an ordinance was created by city leaders and then passed by a majority vote. From all accounts a majority of people in the city support the implementation of the ban.

Of course the ban effects all street solicitation including newspaper sales, and this is where the St. Petersburg Times comes into play. The paper has filed a lawsuit against the city of St. Petersburg in an attempt to have the ordinance rescinded. The following is a short snippet from the Tampa Tribune dated 6/7/10:

“…The Times says in its lawsuit that the ban violates the First Amendment rights of the paper and its readers. The ban also is unconstitutional, the paper argues, because it doesn’t apply to “certain favored types of speech,” including advertisements and political campaigning…”

The St. Petersburg Times doesn’t care about the First Amendment or any other one for that matter. It’s actually kind of funny because it’s a widely known fact that the paper has a very Marxist philosophy, and anyone who can read knows Marxism and the Constitution don’t go together. The Times is likely to continue claiming it’s concerned about First Amendment rights, but we all know that only applies when it suits the paper’s interests.

Click here for original article

Massacre on the Mediterranean: The Gaza Blockade (2)

This is the second article in our series focusing on the Massacre on the Mediterranean. As the mainstream controlled mass media, the kosher-party-line, continues to ignore and/or provide misleading or confusing coverage, we are going to start coving it more extensively. We will discuss in detail all of the factors and variables leading up to and following the Massacre on the Mediterranean.

See also:
Massacre on the Mediterranean: Synopsis (1)

At the heart of this story is the Gaza blockade which has been in place since June 2007. It is easy to underestimate the impact this Israeli blockade has had on the people of Gaza. Remember, it was this blockade that prompted the entire “Freedom Flotilla” episode that resulted in the Massacre on the Mediterranean. Like virtually anything and everything having to do with Israel, the American people are left clueless or completely misinformed regarding the impact of the Gaza blockade. That of course is by design and the official kosher-party-line.

For a little background, I think the BBC did a pretty good job of consolidating and summarizing the largest impacts of the Gaza blockade. You can see the BBC Gaza blockade guide for more on that. There are too many “Israel says” statements for me to get too excited or take the report at face-value. But for sure the guide highlights the things we need to understand. Anyone with an independent mind can use it for a reference to try and understand what impact the Gaza blockade has had.

The best description for the Gaza blockade is what is referred to as “collective punishment”. That is something Israel launches with precision perfection and efficiency excellence. Israel is very good at “collective punishment” and as a military strategy our Gallant Little Ally has a long history for implementing it. And to be honest, if you ignore the pesky Western concepts involving humanitarian concerns and the desire to ‘play fair’ (which are weaknesses from an Israeli perspective), “collective punishment” is very effective.

Ostensibly, Israel claims the Gaza blockade is designed to keep ammunition, weapons, and bomb making materials out of the hands of “terrorists” (which from an Israeli perspective could be a ten year-old child with a rock in his hand). Israel further says the blockade keeps pressure on Hamas leaders by depriving them of some luxury goods. But in practice the results are anything but what Israel claims, and they know it. A recent article in the JTA clearly states the Gaza blockade is also intended to “squeeze Gazans into withdrawing support” for Hamas. That is a form of “collective punishment” and if you were a proponent of ‘democracy’ you could argue how unfair it is since Hamas was democratically elected into power.

Quickly and for reference, note that it is not just me calling the Gaza blockade a matter of “collective punishment”. The world-renowned human-rights organization, Amnesty International, also calls the Gaza blockade “collective punishment” that has created a “humanitarian crisis”. The United Nations calls the blockade a “Medieval siege” but UN resolutions and statements amount to really nothing more than a thorn in Israel’s side. For sure the United Nations has the ability and power to be much more of a pain for Israel. But that is only if it were it not for some of the UNs permanent members like the US and UK, what Israel likes to affectionately call “our friends, the US and other enlightened countries.”

Of course, Amnesty International is almost universally admired and respected for the effort it spends investigating, researching, and documenting human-rights abuses. It is the kind of organization Israel likes to discredit and criticize, something Israel shares with other human-rights havens like the People’s Republic of China and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Amnesty is another entity Israel would consider a royal pain in the arse but I would argue ultimately it creates nothing more than a nuisance for Israel, much like the United Nations.

Once again, the Gaza aid-convoy was intending to break this Israeli blockade. The blockade which has prevented the 1.5 million people living in the Gaza strip from getting the much-needed goods and supplies, the blockade that has created a “humanitarian crisis” resembling a “Medieval siege”, the blockade which was a factor discussed in the Goldstone Report, the blockade ultimately leading to the Massacre on the Mediterranean. I should also note that from the Israeli perspective, the Gaza blockade is officially the result of Hamas ‘violently seizing control’ of Gaza via the democratic process; in other words, they were voted into power, violently I suppose.

All of this is easy to research and learn about and not the objective of this article. The intention here is to better understand how the Gaza blockade resulted in the Massacre on the Mediterranean and the variables in play before that massacre.

Days before the Massacre on the Mediterranean, as the “Freedom Flotilla” was approaching Gaza, we were monitoring the situation closely. As you look back at the way the story was handled in the press, especially as noted in the kosher-party-line via strategic, preemptive PR efforts and statements, you can see how eloquently it all comes together. It is this Kosher-deadly-force two-phase attack that keeps most Americans in the dark. The Israeli PR strategy works very well.

For example, just hours before the “Freedom Flotilla” reached the Gaza shores, Israel’s Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, only a Tribal relationship to the US Senate’s Joseph Lieberman, started the Kosher-deadly-force ‘propaganda’ attack. According to a Ynet News article, an English language Israeli newspaper and part of Yedioth Ahronoth, Lieberman said “There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza” and much more. He added that “Israel is conducting itself in the most humanitarian manner” and that the “Freedom Flotilla” was nothing more than “an attempt at violent propaganda against Israel” and Israel would not “allow violation of (its) sovereignty” .

Some might be thinking who cares what Israel’s Foreign Minister has to say about anything. The answer is painfully simple; the kosher-party-line cares. After the Israeli Foreign Minister’s comments, the kosher-party-line started to help exert the Israeli claim of self-defense, singing the Jewish “premier victim” mantra which hit the top of the charts after WWII. Remember these comments were made just hours before the Massacre on the Mediterranean and started a kosher-party-line media chain-reaction. Check out the US media headlines the days before the Israeli Memorial Day massacre. You will see headlines and articles driven from Avigdor Lieberman statements, usually quoting him directly. These deliberate, calculated, and preemptive Israeli PR efforts, are very effective. In a word this is propaganda; propaganda released by the most effectual and proficient propagandists mankind has ever known; the Tribe of course.

For the record, Avigdor Lieberman is Israel’s current Foreign Minister and he is being investigated for corruption charges. The Israeli police have recommended he be indicted for a new corruption scandal. New because the Israeli police also recommended Avigdor Lieberman be indicted for bribery, money laundering and obstruction of justice charges late last year. And, oh yea, the Israeli police have recently added “breaching the public trust” to the list of charges. Does Avigdor sound like the kind of person who should be feeding headlines and quotes to the kosher-party-line? Hell, he sounds like a Presidential candidate to me. God bless America!

For another example, days before the massacre, Israel appeared to be applying pressure on the Turkish government to prevent the “Freedom Flotilla” from ever leaving Turkey. Plans for some Turkish Members of Parliament to join the flotilla were aborted at the last minute. This and some ‘technical’ issues apparently led to the convenient delay of the “Freedom Flotilla” and a resulting Memorial Day confrontation with the Israeli commandoes, convenient because early on Memorial Day morning most Americans are not watching the news. And just hours before the flotilla would arrive offshore Gaza, Israel “issued warrants that prohibit the entrance of the vessels to Gaza” and started the claim that the humanitarian aid vessels were “violating international law” by bringing supplies and medical aid to the 1.5 million people living in the Gaza strip. Note again for emphasis, the Israeli claim was that the unarmed “Freedom Flotilla”, sailing in international waters, stuffed with thousands of tons of humanitarian aid, medical supplies, food, and hundreds of passengers, including what the Guardian called “Internationally renowned names…, authors, film-makers, politicians and journalists.” were “violating international law” .

For yet another example, note the official Israeli party-line, which of course becomes the defacto kosher-party-line, is that there is not only “no humanitarian crisis” but there is no need for humanitarian aid or supplies in Gaza. That is because Israel filters through and allows supplies into the Gaza strip all the time. But it is the filtering and inspecting as well as the quantity and quality that created the crisis. That last part is not part of the official party-line, just part of reality.

A couple of days before the Massacre on the Mediterranean the Associated Press had an interesting article. The Associated Press is not really considered outside of the kosher-party-line protocol, but it does not follow the party-line as closely as other media sources. A person with any ability for independent thought and a capacity for deductive reasoning can learn from AP articles. For that person, it quickly becomes clear how the Gaza blockade results in “collective punishment” . See the Associated Press, “Israel’s Gaza blockade baffles residents” article.

The Gaza blockade and resulting “humanitarian crisis” is not as simple and straight forward to understand as you might think. It is not just a shortage of food, water and other necessities, the Gaza blockade results in extreme poverty, inflation, and unemployment. Amnesty International estimates that four out of five Gaza residents are completely dependent on humanitarian and financial aid to survive. So fully 80% of the 1.5 million people living in the Gaza strip absolutely require the humanitarian aid Israel is choking away from Gaza. For emphasis and clarity, that means 1.2 million Gaza residents can not get by without assistance and aid from others. The same aid and assistance Israel is blocking.

So even if all of the Gaza supermarkets had plenty of food products, inflated prices and unemployment prevent 1.2 million Gaza residents from being able to purchase and consume them. In addition to the food restrictions that prevent Gazans from eating, restrictions on raw materials used for production prevent the Gazans from being able to find employment. Without the necessary raw materials, production factories shut down and that fuels the unemployment rate.

Further, Israeli will not clearly define which materials are allowed and which are banned. Citing national security concerns, Israel simply will not reveal a complete list of allowed and banned items.

The AFP published an article recently that helps put the Gaza blockade into better perspective. The article cites statistics from an Israeli non-profit, human-rights activist organization called Gisha. Created in 2005 the Israeli organization focuses its time and energy on the human rights of the Palestinians and suffering in the Gaza strip and West Bank. It is staffed mostly by Jews in Israel and abroad and has a Board of Directors comprised predominantly of Jewish professors. They created the Gisha Legal Centre for Freedom of Movement which is cited in the article.

AFP, June 2010 article

“The report….marking three years since closures were tightened said Israel permits just 97 different items to enter, as compared to more than 4,000 that entered before June 2007……Israel keeps out goods that have no apparent military purpose, including ginger, paper and musical instruments…….(Israel) forbids…large blocks of margarine intended for industrial usage yet allows in small packages of margarine for household consumption…..It bans the transfer of rubber, glue and nylon which are used in the production of diapers……yet allows…diapers produced in Israel….Just 2,300 truckloads of goods are allowed in each month, compared to 10,400 before the blockade……adding that some 30,000 trucks enter Manhattan, which has roughly the same population as Gaza…The sanctions have however prevented virtually any reconstruction following Israel’s devastating 22-day war on Hamas that ended in January 2009 and destroyed or severely damaged thousands of homes……”

For more, see the AFP, “Israel keeping basic goods out of Gaza” article for more.

Stay tuned as we continue our the Massacre on the Mediterranean series.